x-rays – what you dont see feel can hurt you - free - may lindstrom skin care products in san fr
English

 A manufacturing enterprise professed in the reaearch & development design,and manufacturing of cosmetics ODM.

x-rays – what you don't see & feel can hurt you - free ... - may lindstrom skin care products in san francisco ca

by:NOX BELLCOW     2019-11-20
x-rays – what you don\'t see & feel can hurt you - free ...  -  may lindstrom skin care products in san francisco ca
No doubt, x-
X-ray technology
Medical rays, CT scans, and perspective have been well done and are a very valuable diagnostic tool.
Although I seriously question its use as a therapeutic toolg.
Radiation therapy for cancer), this will not be the focus of this article. X-rays are high-
Energy nuclear energy emissions capable of passing through the tissue and leaving an image on the film, called radiography (the film itself is not "x-ray\").
Less emission passes through dense tissues like bones, and more emission darkens the film through soft tissue.
This leads to contrast, the internal images we see in the movie are dense tissue, and the darker areas are not very dense.
The little lesson in radiology aside, this is x-
When the light goes through the body that everyone should care about, it does so. The high-energy x-
Ray particles can cause serious damage to their journey through tissue.
When they hit electrons, they give them a high level of unnatural energy.
Like the Bulls in Chinese stores, these electrons cause mutations, including the loss and transfer of DNA materials.
These remains are often beyond the capacity of the DNA repair mechanism.
The resulting chromosome instability is a precursor to cancer.
In fact, cancer is where the cell can no longer know its location and move under normal constraints.
The control mechanism of cell behavior is x-
Light and their abnormal electronic offspring cause serious damage.
Sounds like free.
Radical activity, but the difference is that it is more dynamic and potentially disruptive.
The body has a mechanism to remove and eliminate free radicals, but x-
In addition to these neutralization abilities, the ray energy is several orders of magnitude. X-
A ray mutation can kill a cell or change it.
If the cell is changed, the change is accompanied by it all the time, because the genetic material copies the error.
If more damage occurs to the genetic material, the result is additional. Remember that.
Radiation damage is cumulative.
It will never go away, it will just be added until cell death or genetic abnormalities cause cancer and the resulting organism death.
There is no safe level of radiation.
Like all drugs, it's a game of risk and benefit.
Some people in the medical community think (there is a lot of support data) about 0. 3 billion x-
The radiation received each year increases cancer mortality and is even a very important factor in arterial porridge.
The latter is the result of a sudden lesion of the endothelial (coronary artery wall) to produce a small tumor nest from which arterial plaque appears. Since x-
Rays always cause damage, the damage is related to the amount and intensity of exposure, the obvious solution is x-
X-RAY and low dose X-rayrays.
But don't feel really comfortable with it.
Recent studies suggest that cell repair mechanisms may ignore or delay repair of low-dose radiation damage to genetic material.
High doses kill cells and prevent them from multiplying (cancer) without restriction, probably better than low doses.
But high doses can cause low doses of dispersion and broader potential harm.
What's going on with a chaotic situation?
The problem is that even experts cannot determine the extent of the damage.
But they're all pretty sure about the damage.
We should accept the prompt.
Unfortunately, technicians and radiologists do not always have strict control over x-ray dosing.
They care about diagnostic images that are easy to read, not x-
The light is doing it because they don't move around your organization so gently.
Since the adverse effects are not immediate and cannot be linked to the technology used, caution can almost be left behind.
If people's behavior has no consequences for their behavior, they are not always in your best interest.
I'm not saying that this happens all the time, the medical staff don't care about your safety, just to remind you that the door is open for sloppy work.
It is estimated that dose reduction, Beam Aiming (control), rare
Carbon fiber material, wider lead shielding, ground shielding and filtration, in digital radiography, the reduction of contrast resolution and the use of pulse systems and a series of constraint techniques in perspective can reduce exposure by several times.
That's what they can do.
All you can do is not give it to x-
Light unless absolutely necessary.
Don't run to the emergency room every time your toes get hurt or feel pain.
Don't do everything the doctor says without any doubt.
Find a dentist with only x.
When you can prove it is absolutely necessary.
They are willing to sign a liability waiver if they wish.
Tell them you already have too many x.
You know the danger is cumulative.
The bottom line is, the vast majority of x-
The doctor knows that light is unnecessary.
Any experienced doctor can usually tell you what is wrong before seeing you (usually nothing can cure yourself with a little time), with a little history and palpation (sensitive-
They can go closer.
But they are hesitant to give you their experienced wisdom (which is understandable) because they are worried about their responsibility (yes), not your chromosome damage, which will not appear for many years, it wouldn't have been possible with their x-rays.
So you have to control your body.
Decision on x
By getting information, light and any other medical intervention.
Weigh risks and benefits.
Remember, there is a risk in any medical intervention.
Gofman, JW, medical procedure radiation in the pathogenesis of cancer and heart disease: Dose-
The California San Francisco nuclear responsibility commission responded to 100,000 of every 1999 people with doctors.
JW Gofman, "After three years of peer research, what is Gofman's main criticism of the 1999 studyReview?
\ "The nuclear responsibility commission, San Francisco, CA, 2002.
The FDA has proposed a new X-
Ray regulations: huge health benefits-
Unless the violator has the upper handX-Ray-
The testimony submitted to the FDA on March 31, 2003 "induced disease, excitement, and medical ethics ".
Custom message
Chat Online 编辑模式下无法使用
Leave Your Message inputting...